<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>MAS on From William's Desk</title><link>https://www.william-teo.com/tags/mas/</link><description>Recent content in MAS on From William's Desk</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 03:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.william-teo.com/tags/mas/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Tale of Two Agents</title><link>https://www.william-teo.com/2026/05/a-tale-of-two-agents/</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 03:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.william-teo.com/2026/05/a-tale-of-two-agents/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If you go to an embodied AI seminar this month, you will probably hear the phrase &amp;ldquo;multi-agent system&amp;rdquo; used twice within the same hour — once to describe a team of humanoids learning a soccer policy with MAPPO&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;, and once to describe a swarm of GPT-5.5 &amp;ldquo;agents&amp;rdquo; spawned by OpenClaw&lt;sup id="fnref:2"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; to write a software project.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The two settings share almost nothing beyond the noun. And yet the noun is doing all the work. Conferences, grant calls, internal roadmaps, and breathless tech-press articles routinely flatten them into a single object of study. The result is a steady leak of claims, benchmarks, and engineering arguments across a category boundary that should not be crossed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>